🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume atomic talks with Washington provided that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed new appeals had originated from mediators to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging path since Iran does not want appear to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful defensively and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Ended

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, EU nations used their authority to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative the American negotiator only for the arrangement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be resurrected in some form if discussions reopen.

The American leader in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of inactivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Stance

In his address to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by military means. He asserted the attacks began with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust challenging to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Final Resolution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently sought to dictate their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and stays the final solution to settle conflicts, but its requirements, rules and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be restored; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more integrated, and more endorsing of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."