🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.