‘It’s deeply saddening’: the way thirty confined white whales are now pawns in conflict over animal welfare.
Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming little “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a large but guardian-like companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.
A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a disagreement between a defunct facility, public officials and welfare campaigners.
But those closest to the whales say the impassioned debate over their destiny often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the humans who interact with them daily.
After the national authorities prevented the sale of the belugas to China, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are kept warned to euthanize them unless the government funds the expense of their survival. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that request, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain situation.
Intelligent Marine Mammals
Scientists say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and group interactions suggest they are highly cognitive mammals – something one caretaker discovered personally.
She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that entailed earning the trust of the sea creatures.
“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”
The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the details and quirks in their personalities. She developed a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting temperaments.
“Eve selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Both transformed the way I view connection.”
Growing Opposition and Facility Decline
Her interaction with the whales evolved against a context of rising activist criticism to their enclosure.
During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a number which the facility links to natural mortality, but which campaigners say indicates the poor conditions in which they were maintained.
The facility did not admit visitors to the guests over the recent season, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand effects of the shutdown. “Concrete is deteriorating from the pools because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and move about with chunks in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”
The facility did not comment to a inquiry, but previously stated: “The whales … receive far better health care and constant attention than any human in the Britain, or anywhere else.”
Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions
The former employee was terminated from the park in the spring following the demise of a beluga, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the facility suspected details of the death were disclosed to the media and she was let go shortly thereafter.
The lack of clarity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any plans to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “considerable staff”, vehicles and machinery.
“It cannot happen in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess backs requests for the whales to be removed promptly from the park, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.
In late September, the nation’s government official turned down a bid to transfer the whales to an overseas location.
“To approve the request would have meant a perpetual situation in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As society, we know that marine mammals are meant for the wild, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in good conscience permit an transfer that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have suffered.”
But Burgess said the minister’s comments reflect a wider incorrect perception of the realities of existence for belugas born in captivity.
“The public needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As authorities work to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of food for Inuit communities.
A proposed protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which has received regulatory clearance, has been most controversial. The prospective facility, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain positive that it could ultimately represent a permanent answer for some of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an experiment” in the whales’ future.
Some experts say the possibility of a refuge indicates a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible solution in the near future.
The project lead, head of the sanctuary project, said the location will mimic the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|